<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Low in Advertising Unnatural Breasts</title>
	<link>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/25/new-low-in-unnatural-breasts-in-advertising/181</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BB Surf 6: What We&#8217;ve Been Reading &#124;</title>
		<link>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/25/new-low-in-unnatural-breasts-in-advertising/181#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>BB Surf 6: What We&#8217;ve Been Reading &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/25/new-low-in-unnatural-breasts-in-advertising/181#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>[...] forget that, oh, yeah, real breasts have nipples. We caught on to this a while ago; rememberthat ad for &#8220;seamless&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] forget that, oh, yeah, real breasts have nipples. We caught on to this a while ago; rememberthat ad for &#8220;seamless&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gloria</title>
		<link>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/25/new-low-in-unnatural-breasts-in-advertising/181#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>Gloria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/25/new-low-in-unnatural-breasts-in-advertising/181#comment-919</guid>
		<description>Nipples have a virgin/slut dilemma all their own. When they seen feeding babies, they are so natural, so pure, a gift from heaven. But when they are simply seen, then they are dirty, lust-inducing, drive men out of their minds, an affront to civilized society, etc. This lingerie company, which is working so hard to hide the nipples, should have a line called Nipple burqa!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nipples have a virgin/slut dilemma all their own. When they seen feeding babies, they are so natural, so pure, a gift from heaven. But when they are simply seen, then they are dirty, lust-inducing, drive men out of their minds, an affront to civilized society, etc. This lingerie company, which is working so hard to hide the nipples, should have a line called Nipple burqa!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Hutchinson</title>
		<link>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/25/new-low-in-unnatural-breasts-in-advertising/181#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Hutchinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/25/new-low-in-unnatural-breasts-in-advertising/181#comment-918</guid>
		<description>I'm always fascinated at how you can show an entire breast with just the nipple covered and it is considered a "clean" photo... but add a nipple, and suddenly it's lewd.  

I find it to be discriminatory that men can walk around with shirts off, but the second anyone can see a nipple outlined through a woman's shirt, she's considered slutty.  I want to just say that WOMEN HAVE NIPPLES AND THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THEM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always fascinated at how you can show an entire breast with just the nipple covered and it is considered a &#8220;clean&#8221; photo&#8230; but add a nipple, and suddenly it&#8217;s lewd.  </p>
<p>I find it to be discriminatory that men can walk around with shirts off, but the second anyone can see a nipple outlined through a woman&#8217;s shirt, she&#8217;s considered slutty.  I want to just say that WOMEN HAVE NIPPLES AND THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THEM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/25/new-low-in-unnatural-breasts-in-advertising/181#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 02:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/25/new-low-in-unnatural-breasts-in-advertising/181#comment-905</guid>
		<description>Firstly... if the lingerie company put nipples on the model they would not be able to use it..."too graphic".

Secondly... when I had my reconstruction surgery following breast cancer, I opted NOT to have a nipple reconstructed. I did not want the additional surgery. I wanted the reconstruction to help with how I looked in clothes...not how I looked naked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly&#8230; if the lingerie company put nipples on the model they would not be able to use it&#8230;&#8221;too graphic&#8221;.</p>
<p>Secondly&#8230; when I had my reconstruction surgery following breast cancer, I opted NOT to have a nipple reconstructed. I did not want the additional surgery. I wanted the reconstruction to help with how I looked in clothes&#8230;not how I looked naked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
