<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Target Disses &#8220;Non-Traditional Media.&#8221; Hey, That&#8217;s Us!</title>
	<link>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/15/target-disses-non-traditional-media-hey-thats-us/176</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gloria</title>
		<link>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/15/target-disses-non-traditional-media-hey-thats-us/176#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>Gloria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/15/target-disses-non-traditional-media-hey-thats-us/176#comment-847</guid>
		<description>Amy, 

The Deets is tooooo funny!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy, </p>
<p>The Deets is tooooo funny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaping Youth</title>
		<link>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/15/target-disses-non-traditional-media-hey-thats-us/176#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaping Youth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 06:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/15/target-disses-non-traditional-media-hey-thats-us/176#comment-843</guid>
		<description>And Pam? Do thank your husband for his input; nice to hear a male's perspective too...many have echoed same. 

&lt;a href="http://www.thedeets.com/2008/01/14/target-snubs-offended-parent-who-blogs/#comments" rel="nofollow"&gt;Here's&lt;/a&gt; some visual commentary/pithy prose along the lines of 'what if they'd art directed the 'snow angel' as a targeted MALE model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Pam? Do thank your husband for his input; nice to hear a male&#8217;s perspective too&#8230;many have echoed same. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.thedeets.com/2008/01/14/target-snubs-offended-parent-who-blogs/#comments" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s</a> some visual commentary/pithy prose along the lines of &#8216;what if they&#8217;d art directed the &#8217;snow angel&#8217; as a targeted MALE model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaping Youth</title>
		<link>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/15/target-disses-non-traditional-media-hey-thats-us/176#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaping Youth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 06:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/15/target-disses-non-traditional-media-hey-thats-us/176#comment-842</guid>
		<description>Mary and Gloria, as I wade through the flame-throwing hate mail and personal attacks on being a 'dirty minded sex fiend' with accusations of 'craziness' or 'probably some god-squad type' I'm heartened to at least hear some sanity from colleagues in the field dealing with these issues on a national health level. 

I've tried to 'take the high road' citing statistics and studies and the APA taskforce report ad infinitum about the early sexualization and objectification cues in our appearance-driven media culture, but it seems to fall on deaf ears as a big 'over-reaction.' 

I hope it either blows into a larger story about the universal context of advertising objectification overall (vs. the focus on one this one ad) or they let it drop altogether and move on to the big issue of 'non-traditional press' (which to me is actually a huge story, based on their archaic/misguided handling of Web 2.0 users, to your demographic points above) but it never ceases to amaze me how short-sighted corporations can be dancing on the fine line fringe of ethics and responsibility. (e.g. like  their 'Rounders' stealth street team for buzz-marketing using kids as shills a la P&#38;G's Tremors.com) 

Realize I'm slow getting the interview questions to you, but as they say, 'it hit the fan'...so apologies for the delays. Thanks for the support...feelin' a bit battered and bullied by a population I'm having a hard time relating to on a 'centrist/logical' level...bleh. 

Flamethrowers sans reasoned debate is NOT my cuppa tea, so thanks for the kind words. Nicest discourse I've had all day. Best, Amy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary and Gloria, as I wade through the flame-throwing hate mail and personal attacks on being a &#8216;dirty minded sex fiend&#8217; with accusations of &#8216;craziness&#8217; or &#8216;probably some god-squad type&#8217; I&#8217;m heartened to at least hear some sanity from colleagues in the field dealing with these issues on a national health level. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried to &#8216;take the high road&#8217; citing statistics and studies and the APA taskforce report ad infinitum about the early sexualization and objectification cues in our appearance-driven media culture, but it seems to fall on deaf ears as a big &#8216;over-reaction.&#8217; </p>
<p>I hope it either blows into a larger story about the universal context of advertising objectification overall (vs. the focus on one this one ad) or they let it drop altogether and move on to the big issue of &#8216;non-traditional press&#8217; (which to me is actually a huge story, based on their archaic/misguided handling of Web 2.0 users, to your demographic points above) but it never ceases to amaze me how short-sighted corporations can be dancing on the fine line fringe of ethics and responsibility. (e.g. like  their &#8216;Rounders&#8217; stealth street team for buzz-marketing using kids as shills a la P&amp;G&#8217;s Tremors.com) </p>
<p>Realize I&#8217;m slow getting the interview questions to you, but as they say, &#8216;it hit the fan&#8217;&#8230;so apologies for the delays. Thanks for the support&#8230;feelin&#8217; a bit battered and bullied by a population I&#8217;m having a hard time relating to on a &#8216;centrist/logical&#8217; level&#8230;bleh. </p>
<p>Flamethrowers sans reasoned debate is NOT my cuppa tea, so thanks for the kind words. Nicest discourse I&#8217;ve had all day. Best, Amy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gloria</title>
		<link>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/15/target-disses-non-traditional-media-hey-thats-us/176#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>Gloria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/15/target-disses-non-traditional-media-hey-thats-us/176#comment-841</guid>
		<description>If bloggers are the voices are real people, and Target doesn't care what bloggers have to say, that's symbolically disdaining the consumer, no? I mean, Amy Jussel is NOT tolerating it, but when she complained, Target wouldn't even give her the time of day. It's amazing that a company like Target, which works so hard to be cool and hip, maintains a PR policy that positively 1990s! I bet they pay millions for some hoity-toity advertising company to handle this stuff for them. Hey, Target, give me just 1 % what you're paying for your PR -- even 1% of 1% -- and I guarantee you'll get better advice! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If bloggers are the voices are real people, and Target doesn&#8217;t care what bloggers have to say, that&#8217;s symbolically disdaining the consumer, no? I mean, Amy Jussel is NOT tolerating it, but when she complained, Target wouldn&#8217;t even give her the time of day. It&#8217;s amazing that a company like Target, which works so hard to be cool and hip, maintains a PR policy that positively 1990s! I bet they pay millions for some hoity-toity advertising company to handle this stuff for them. Hey, Target, give me just 1 % what you&#8217;re paying for your PR &#8212; even 1% of 1% &#8212; and I guarantee you&#8217;ll get better advice! <img src='http://beautyandthebreast.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/15/target-disses-non-traditional-media-hey-thats-us/176#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 04:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://beautyandthebreast.org/2008/01/15/target-disses-non-traditional-media-hey-thats-us/176#comment-840</guid>
		<description>Just showed the photo of the Target billboard to my husband.  He was angry and said he finds is offensive to all women...and " the only thing that is missing is an arrow pointing to her crotch!" What the hell has gotten into the advertising mentality that they think this sort of thing is cute?  I don't put all the blame on the companies though... some of the blame belongs on the consumers that tolerate this sort of crap!  GRRR
Pam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just showed the photo of the Target billboard to my husband.  He was angry and said he finds is offensive to all women&#8230;and &#8221; the only thing that is missing is an arrow pointing to her crotch!&#8221; What the hell has gotten into the advertising mentality that they think this sort of thing is cute?  I don&#8217;t put all the blame on the companies though&#8230; some of the blame belongs on the consumers that tolerate this sort of crap!  GRRR<br />
Pam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
