http://beautyandthebreast.org/2007/12/14/rehashing-old-numbers/154 Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:29:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 http://beautyandthebreast.org/2007/12/14/rehashing-old-numbers/154#comment-580 Pam Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:02:00 +0000 http://beautyandthebreast.org/2007/12/14/rehashing-old-numbers/154#comment-580 What has ALWAYS angered me on the so called "studies" is that they have NEVER actually examined any women hands on. All their so called studies are just what has been written down in medical files. It appears that they have picked and choosend which files they included in the so called studies!! LOOKING AT FILES IS NOT SCIENCE! Pam What has ALWAYS angered me on the so called “studies” is that they have NEVER actually examined any women hands on. All their so called studies are just what has been written down in medical files. It appears that they have picked and choosend which files they included in the so called studies!! LOOKING AT FILES IS NOT SCIENCE! Pam

]]> http://beautyandthebreast.org/2007/12/14/rehashing-old-numbers/154#comment-574 gretchen Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:30:37 +0000 http://beautyandthebreast.org/2007/12/14/rehashing-old-numbers/154#comment-574 I personally have spoken to women SICK from the silicone trials. Are they being listened to? No! Studies are done for what reason then? To make people sick then not report the findings? It is quite scary actually, and sad. And, I got silicone implants a month after they were "RE-APPROVED" to be safe. Were they safe? NOPE! I personally have spoken to women SICK from the silicone trials. Are they being listened to? No! Studies are done for what reason then? To make people sick then not report the findings? It is quite scary actually, and sad. And, I got silicone implants a month after they were “RE-APPROVED” to be safe. Were they safe? NOPE!

]]>