A Good Q&A About Breast Implants
I came across this Q&A at everydayhealth.com:
Are Implants Dangerous?
Q: I have a family history of breast cancer (my grandmother died from it). I’m interested in breast implants for enlargement, but I’m afraid of breast cancer. I researched on the Internet and found out that silicone is dangerous. What about the other kind, which is only salt and water? Are those dangerous too for a person like me? I really appreciate your help to help me to make a decision.
— Azadeh T., Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
A: While some implants are used to reconstruct a breast that has been removed because of cancer (breast reconstruction after mastectomy), the majority of breast implant surgery is done for elective breast augmentation (enlargement). That’s cosmetic surgery, and anytime you are considering a surgical procedure for cosmetic reasons, you should be sure to understand the known risks, and to understand that some risks might not have yet been identified.
The possibility that silicone implants can increase the risk of developing connective tissue problems was not known until many years after this type of implant had started being widely used. The FDA is currently studying the risks further to determine whether silicone implants are safe, so they are not routinely available now. Most breast implants that are available are saline (salt water).Either silicone or saline implants can have complications — including decreased nipple sensation, pain, unattractive appearance, scarring, infection, or implant rupture — but data thus far suggest that neither type has been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. You should know, however, that breast implants may make it more difficult for a mammogram to find a breast cancer. This might be of particular concern for women at high risk for developing breast cancer, such as women with a strong family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer.
You should discuss your family history of breast cancer with your physician, and carefully weigh the risks and benefits before you make your decision about elective breast augmentation.
The answer was given by Dr. Martee L. Hensley, an Every Day Health Specialist and a practicing oncologist at Sloan-Kettering. Her specialty is gynecologic cancer.
Needless to say, this Q&A is a bit old. It was published on Oct. 30, 2006, a few weeks before the FDA lifted the ban on silicone breast implants in November 2006. But I wanted to share this because:
1) It shows how information on the Internet, no matter how outdated, can live on and on, continuing to influence people. This is a personal lesson for me, a “newbie.”
2) I like this exchange very much because it’s from a questioner who obviously did her homework: Azadeh starts by ruling out silicone breast implants altogether because of the risks.
3) And the answerer, Dr. Hensley, seems to warn off Azadeh from unnecessary surgery by emphasizing that the patient must thoroughly understand the known risks. She says, the patient must “understand that some risks might not have yet been identified,” which is pretty scary! Breast implant surgery is serious, with the discomfort and risks associated with any major procedure, and I feel terrible that there are so many women willing to go through it for the sake of improving their physical appearance. I think Dr. Henley agrees with me.
4) Finally, Dr. Henley acknowledges that there is the possibility that silicone implants can increase the risk of developing connective tissue problems. Of course, now that silicone implants are back on the market, I wonder what Dr. Henley is saying now. Does she buy the FDA conclusion that breast implants are safe enough and so we should allow women to get them, or did she read the fine print requiring ongoing study, which essentially makes silicone breast implant recipients guinea pigs?













I hope that women who are considering getting breast implants read this. They are trying to achieve a standard of beauty which is potentially very dangerous and damaging to their bodies.
Comment by mcshinda — July 18, 2007 @ 8:05 pm
These kinds of discussions are so critical - so many women are being misled by the media hype around breast implants - and narrow “ideal” body types in general. It is no wonder that the vast majority of women are not only dissatisfied with their bodies, they are spending hours and hours thinking about how to “alter” their size or shape, rather than doing those things in life that we know ALREADY will give us great pleasure.
Teen Voices Magazine is a wonderful antidote to a lot of the misleading and even misogynist content that we see all day long….do get it for the teen girls you know.
-Judy Norsigian (Our Bodies Ourselves)
Comment by jnorsigian — July 19, 2007 @ 8:36 am
Lots of good talk on this site about “improvements” and how bogus all this not to mention the health risks….but with a friend scheduled for breast cancer surgery next month that will result in one breast pretty much obliterated where does one get straight info on reconstruction — especially alternatives to silicone, e.g. using her own body fat from another spot on her body?
Comment by jk — July 19, 2007 @ 9:23 am
In 1975, I became a young breast cancer survivor at the age of 27. In 1980, I began the long, painful journey through total and failed breast reconstruction.
Unfortunately, there are no more unbiased sources of information for breast reconstruction today than there were in 1980.
The American Society of Plastic and Reconstruction Surgeons can not answer the question. There are no long-term studies of women who underwent reconstruction past the 10 year post reconstruction surgery.
All women who undergo reconstruction are in the “honeymoon” stage in the first few years. We are just so glad that empty space on the chest is filled again. By the time patients figure out they have been duped into these life-changing surgeries, the damage is done.
Reconstruction is a temporary fix causing permanent damage.
Reconstruction following breast cancer IS an acceptable diagnosis to obtain Social Security Disability. I know. I was just approved.
Pam Dowd
Implant Veterans of Toxic Exposure
Comment by pamgd — August 15, 2007 @ 12:16 pm